Gender in the Twilight Movies
About a week ago, I watched all the Twilight
movies. Don’t ask what prompted me to do this to myself, because frankly, I
have no idea. I’m going to blame it on the fact that I’ve hardly left my house
for over seven months. I won’t lie, I enjoyed the films, because they are
hilarious and have interesting enough plots that I didn’t get bored. However, I
found that there are many things about the Twilight movies and books
that are problematic, the most prominent being the way gender plays a role in
Bella’s and Edward’s relationship.
There are several ways in which Twilight
plays into toxic tropes of heterosexual relationships. First, Edward has a lot
of power over Bella and her emotions, especially since Bella has such an
unhealthy obsession with him. Edward does many inconsiderate things to Bella: he
abandons her during the second movie which takes a huge toll on her, but visits
her in a weird ghostly apparition (which is never explained) driving her into
further emotional turmoil, he essentially tells her that he wants to kill
himself, and he almost gets her killed when he takes her to play baseball with
his family and several evil vampires show up and want to eat her. Overall, he’s
a pretty crappy boyfriend, but Bella’s love for him is completely unwavering
because he is the knight-in-shining-armor male love interest, and therefore can
do no wrong. As an audience, we are supposed to go along with the idea that
Edward and Bella’s relationship is romantic and perfect, even though Edward
gets away with things that should be very difficult to forgive.
To continue the point that Edward has too
much power of Bella, he is always telling her what to do and almost always
calls the shots in their relationship, playing into the idea that the man always
takes the lead in a straight relationship. Edward’s commands of Bella range
from making her go to prom to coercing her into marrying him even though she doesn’t
believe in the institution of marriage and telling her to abort their baby. Those
decisions are obviously things that Bella should be able to decide.
Edward is incredibly controlling of Bella, but because he is a man and
presented as the *protector* in the relationship, this unhealthy behavior is
hidden under the guise of wanting to keep Bella safe. Additionally, it certainly
doesn’t help that Edward is 109 years old (another layer of yikes in their
already toxic relationship) and therefore feels like he knows best in every
situation.
Finally,
I want to address the sense of danger in Bella’s and Edward’s relationship. Apparently,
Bella’s blood is especially tasty smelling to vampires, which means that though
Edward loves Bella, he constantly has to suppress the urge kill her. In the
first couple movies, they can hardly kiss because Edward can barely stop
himself from killing her. Additionally, the first time they do the do, Edward
can’t control his supernatural strength and leaves bruises all over Bella’s
body, and destroys their bedframe. Obviously, this is terrible and romanticizes
violence in relationships by selling it under “it’s exciting because it’s risky”
and “star-crossed lovers” tropes. The fact that Edward has the urge to hurt his
romantic partner should be a huge red flag, but like all the other problems in
their relationship, the audience is supposed to see it as part of the romance.
This is so interesting Ryan! I just recently rewatched Twilight too and the toxicity of all of the romantic relationships is definitely hard to ignore. It seems to me like it's all of the romanticized but toxic elements of romantic relationships in like movies and tv taken to the very extreme (as everything in Twilight kind of is). The way that things like Edwards uncontrollable violent urges and creepy stalking are portrayed as romantic is also really concerning, and this seems like a really good breakdown of all of that stuff.
ReplyDelete